Ethereum · Closed candles only
ETH: Wyckoff markup — accumulation, distribution and phases
ETH now: 1H — distribution, phase A; 4H — no range; 1D — no range.
Scanner snapshot: . Latest event: .
Latest available closed candles: 1H: ; 4H: ; 1D: .
Instrument panel
Event history over 30 days
Instrument rows: 6. Candle close time in MSK; UTC is available in the tooltip.
| When | TF | Event | Phase | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1H | LPS | D | target reached | |
| 1H | SOS | D | target reached | |
| 1H | Test | C | target reached | |
| 1H | Spring | C | target reached | |
| 1D | Range closed | B | invalidation | |
| 1D | UTAD | C | cancelled |
Two-year statistics
Event types and timeframes are counted separately. n includes completed outcomes only; cancelled and waiting events are excluded. Shares are withheld when n < 20.
2024-10-01 — 2026-10-01. Using available scanner history; no observations does not mean zero probability.
| TF | Type | n | Target | Invalidation | No result | Cancelled / waiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1H | Spring | 21 | 23.8% | 42.9% | 33.3% | 4 / 0 |
| 1H | UTAD | 18 | Insufficient data | 2 / 0 | ||
| 1H | Test | 32 | 34.4% | 0.0% | 65.6% | 2 / 0 |
| 1H | LPS | 11 | Insufficient data | 3 / 0 | ||
| 1H | LPSY | 2 | Insufficient data | 4 / 0 | ||
| 1H | SOS | 6 | Insufficient data | 5 / 0 | ||
| 1H | SOW | 2 | Insufficient data | 3 / 0 | ||
| 4H | Spring | 6 | Insufficient data | 4 / 0 | ||
| 4H | UTAD | 4 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 4H | Test | 8 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 4H | LPS | 2 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 4H | LPSY | 1 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 4H | SOS | 0 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 4H | SOW | 1 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 1D | Spring | 2 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 1D | UTAD | 2 | Insufficient data | 2 / 0 | ||
| 1D | Test | 2 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 1D | LPS | 0 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 1D | LPSY | 0 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 1D | SOS | 0 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
| 1D | SOW | 0 | Insufficient data | 0 / 0 | ||
Reading ETH markup
The Ethereum page separates ETH structure from neighbouring cryptocurrencies. A broad crypto rally may look convincing, but it does not replace Ethereum’s own secondary tests or checks of its upper boundary. Hourly, four-hour and daily ETH views are processed independently. You can therefore encounter a completed short range while the larger structure has not formed yet. An empty daily phase is a meaningful observation in that situation, not a missing field that should be filled with Bitcoin’s phase.
For Ethereum, the return after an impulse deserves attention: did the close remain outside the corridor, did a quieter approach develop, and was the parent breakout subsequently cancelled? A test and a confirmed SOS serve different functions in this sequence. ETH trades around the clock, making weekend events part of the observed sample. The real volume supplied by the feed belongs to these candles rather than to every Ethereum transaction worldwide. Several dependent labels do not constitute several independent recommendations. To inspect continuation, compare the event mark, the next completed candle and the final status in this instrument’s history. Keeping these observations together prevents a visually strong old breakout from being mistaken for a current confirmed setup.
What ETH shows now: 1H — distribution, phase A; 4H — no range; 1D — no range. The Ethereum archive has 6 rows over 30 days; 120 completions across separate two-year samples. These values belong to the verified server snapshot. Do not confuse the moment the page is received with the event moment; both dates appear beside the heading. A market without a working area normally reports no range. That state is not replaced with a neighbouring timeframe’s phase or the last successful historical drawing. Keeping the timestamps visible makes this distinction inspectable.
The ETH panel reads the same candles as the general scanner. Switching scale does not change the data provider. A candle obtains its final value after it closes; later bars can finish the working area or cancel a dependent label. In the Ethereum view, compare boundaries with the actual close rather than just a wick. An educational schematic explains phase order, but it does not depict real prices from the selected day.
ETH statistics have a separate n for each code and scale. The three shares distinguish target completion, invalidation and completion without a result. Waiting observations are not yet included in the denominator; cancellation stays in history but is excluded as well. Below twenty Ethereum completions, insufficient data replaces percentages. Another market’s sample does not enlarge this one. Several dependent events must not be read as independent promises of a return.
Ethereum has real market volume from this feed, not the sum of arbitrary external venues. Related surfaces for ETH include the full scanner, schematics, method, chart and Magnitude. Each answers a different question. The atlas explains Ethereum events, the chart exposes prices, and impulse size does not automatically establish accumulation. Retain the time and final outcome of an example so that you can compare the same case later. The sequence of facts matters more than the resemblance of two unrelated chart fragments.
FAQ
Why does the ETH phase differ between scales?
Each ETH timeframe is marked independently using closed candles. Available scales are 1H, 4H, 1D. A missing structure is not copied from another scale.
What does ETH volume mean?
This is real market volume from Ethereum feed candles, not the combined activity of every external venue or network operation.
Why are ETH event percentages missing?
Each event type and timeframe requires at least 20 completed outcomes. Waiting and cancelled observations are excluded from n; a smaller sample is labelled insufficient data.